 |
| Image of New London Police Chief, Peter Reichard is digitally altered. The quote from him is accurate, however. |
-
Welcome
The following message was sent to Mayor M. Passero of New London Connecticut regarding several important matters that are alleged to require his immediate attention. The sender is author/web developer, Jonathan Brand, aka Alph^, who is also the author of this blog. Note that the email has already been published to other URLs that will receive SEO credit for them, and that this Google blog is unlikely to benefit in search results as the result of containing syndicated information.Having said that, Google continues to surprise and figuratively impress the socks off of developers including this author. It means that with regard to this particular blog's organic Google's search ranking, "We shall see." With regard to our privacy policy and cookie handling, there is no privacy on the web outside of the TOR browser. It's integrity may soon be compromised and require solutions that are currently in development by a worldwide group in which this author is a member. We moving as fast as possible to defend your freedom and protect your safety online. We are legion. Thank you for visiting, and enjoy.
--- Sent and received by email on June 18, 2017 ---
Mr. Mayor:
Although you have wisely deleted all visible record of these matters by banning my personal account from the City's Facebook page and by allowing Mr. Reichard to do the same on the City's police page - It is important to leave record in this format where I can summarize one important problem of several, all of which require your immediate attention:
On or about April 17, 2017 I read Mr. Reichard's arrest report for a David Gun. While the nature of the case will not be repeated here as a simple matter of good taste, what I read explicitly shows that Mr. Gun was arrested without legal cause for arrest. Allow me to explain briefly: The original arrest report which remains on Facebook's server and can be subpoenaed by you, states that a plan of arrest is made after a local Pharmacy reports a specific activity by Mr. Gun. The plan for arrest oddly states that a search will take place for an illegal item it refers to only as "object." The following paragraph gives a basic overview of the plan as it occurred when executed: Mr. Gun's home is entered the search is performed, however the "object," is not found. Mr. Gun is arrested anyway. Combined with the media reports of this incident, it is disclosed and understood that police found cause for arrest after the arrest was made. This mistake is commonly referred to by defense attorney's as one in which the ends justify the means and requires the immediate release of Mr. Gun, so far as one can tell. It also requires that his charges be dropped until police can get it right.
As in all documented/published cases to date, Mr. Reichard responded to my post with a question on this topic by violating another law, this time Constitutional law. He banned my personal account from our community's public police page on FB, deleting all record of his awareness of my comment. However, Facebook server logs will show you that he did not stop there. What I also witnessed at the time of my account's ban from the police page in April, was the immediate disappearance of Gun's arrest record. When I noticed it was back online at Facebook, I read it again. In its current form, that fact that no cause for arrest was obtained, has been deleted. It reads well now and fact remains that by law, Mr. Passero, it appears you would now be obligated to subpoena these records from Facebook or be named as an accomplice. I can virtually assure you the the records in his case can and will be obtained either way..
With regard to my, "Personal Grievance" about being falsely charged with a felony and cast as a medical helicopter-thwarting risk, heroically neutralized and intercepted by New London police, you already have the information needed to approach and resolve the matter at this live link. Notice that it is receiving some shares already as I finalize my civil claim for local filing. You may want to deal with this head-on, not in the Mr. Reichard deals with these problems however. Attached, you will find the latest article published to the web as my team rapidly dissembles the SEO/Google search presence constructed by Mr. Reichard's attempts create his own positive history which date back 10 years. The SEO disassembly process was initiated by Mr. Reichard's failure to comply with CT's Freedom of Information Act laws by refusing to answer a lawful FOIA request sent by certified mail, signed for by our police department on the morning of June 8. I appreciate your efforts in assuring for the record that you do not appear an accomplice to this violation of law as well.
Regarding the status of accomplice, I would very much appreciate your input into why public defender, Shawn Tiernan of the New London Superior Court informed me on record that in my case, regarding the felony charge from April 2016 which I am not permitted to see, "The law does not apply." In fact, if you can ensure that he changes course in protecting police from having to reveal 3-5 surveillance video's of the alleged helicopter incident at L&M hospital, you can avoid being an accomplice to the deliberate filing of false felony charges as well, which is beneficial to you.
You are quoted in the news as stating that the official who dismissed Mr. Reichard from the New Haven Police Department assured you that he was fit to serve in New London. Assuming this quote is not meant to refer to our former Mayor, and does refer to you, is that true that you were given this information?
You are quoted in the news as stating that the official who dismissed Mr. Reichard from the New Haven Police Department assured you that he was fit to serve in New London. Assuming this quote is not meant to refer to our former Mayor, and does refer to you, is that true that you were given this information?
You will find it impossible to delete this record of your knowledge and awareness of these legal matters delivered in this format, Mr. Mayor. Based on the fact that news media and Federal agencies are receiving copy of this message openly and by BCC, you can be assured that eyes from above are looking down. Because there is no God, these eyes refer to the auspices of our Federal government, which remains a formidable opponent for you nonetheless.
In God We Trust,
Jonathan Brand
From: Jonathan Brand <187947@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Thank you for opening the email
To: "Wright, Brian" <bwright@ci.new-london.ct.us>, preichard@ci.new-london.ct.us
Cc: tips@fbi.gov, tips@theday.com, "Tiernan, Shawn (Public Defenders)" <shawn.tiernan@jud.ct.gov>, ctc-tribletter@chicagotribune.
Capt. Wright, Acting Chief Reichard:
You did not respond to any of my legal inquires by phone, by email or by mail. As you are aware, Acting Chief Reichard, your department signed for a valid FOIA request addressed to your name on the morning of June 8, 2017. To my knowledge you have failed to comply with the law in the State of Connecticut regarding Freedom of Information Act. As usual, your failure to comply with the law is met by you with continued violations of law that effectively put each matter on hold until the resulting violation is dealt with and resolved. In this instance however, your failure to respond to the FOIA request received June 8th will be placed on hold instead, as to pursue a much smaller item, the name of arresting officer in my case. You will find the details of this arrest in this thread and online. I have repeated the question in this email which is being forwarded to CT Bar association and the Federal Borough of Investigation for record. Your failure to comply and abide by both State and Federal rule of law, has cost me more than 1 year of my life to date. If your department refuses to email the name requested by tomorrow, June 19, I will hand the matter of your non-compliance in obtaining this name to the Court in Norwich, at which point my involvement with the task will draw to a close.
Note that on record for June 17, 2017, is call number 2 of 2 placed from my cell to your dispatcher yesterday, in which I was told that a FOIA request must be sent to a, "different address at 5 Governor Winthrop Rd..," he continued, "Everybody knows that." When I informed him that I sent the FOIA request to (Acting) Chief Reichard at that very address and asked who to address the next one to, your dispatcher appears to have disconnected the call.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Brand
Comments
Post a Comment